Peer Review Process

Reviewers must have the Scopus-ID or Researcher-ID (Thomson Reuters) or recorded as a first author in this journal with (minimum has) a doctoral degree.

Reviewers may also be invited from journals published by major publishers such as Elsevier or Springer. They must come from different institutions with authors; preferably originating from different countries. Reviewers must not be subject to a conflict of interest involving the author(s) or manuscript(s). Nevertheless, the editor is not obligated to use any reviewers suggested by the author(s).

All articles submitted to JPPK will be proceeded double blind peer review by (minimum) 2 peer-reviewers who are expert in their field. The Editor may assign the Reviewer(s) from the JPPK's Peer-reviewers. The acceptance of an article by Editor depends on the novelty of research, significance of the article, truth of the content, the degree of originality, the clarity of description, and the conformity with the objective of the journal. Language used in this journal is Indonesia.

Articles may be accepted without revision, minor revisions, major revision, or rejected. The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully in 30 to 60 days. The author is given an opportunity to revise his article based on the reviewers' suggestion (and editor) no later than 8 weeks after the email notification. 

All incoming articles will be checked for authenticity to prevent plagiarism by using turnitin and/or iThenticate anti-plagiarism software.

Authors will not be charged an Article Publication Fees to maintain the journal management process. All articles published on JPPK are open access by following the Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. Full license can be found here